Dar es Salaam, Lilongwe meet on
Lake Nyasa flops
By Songa wa
Songa
The Citizen Reporter
The Citizen Reporter
Lilongwe.
Tanzania and Malawi on Saturday failed to reach a mutual agreement on their
disputed border on Lake Nyasa. They, however, agreed to continue pursuing the
matter via alternative diplomatic channels.
The two
countries agreed to disagree during a meeting held in Lilongwe to resolve the
decades long dispute which, after years of apparent lull, re-emerged earlier
this month when Tanzania raised the red flag when a government agency alerted
it that Malawi was undertaking gas exploration that covered the entire lake.
At the end of
the Saturday talks involving the topmost government officials from both
countries, Tanzania’s minister for Foreign Affairs and International
Cooperation Bernard Membe and his Malawian counterpart Ephraim Chiume, declared
in a joint communiqué that the two sides failed to reach a consensus.
The crucial
meeting, which was also attended by minister for Lands, Housing and Human
Settlements Development Anna Tibaijuka, was a follow-up of an earlier one held
in Dar es Salaam last month.
After going
through reports submitted by two committees: joint technical committee and
joint committee of officials that had been meeting in the city of Mzuzu since
Monday last week, the announcement was finally made.
“Our cardinal
differences still remain. We have to go ahead with these meetings so that we
resolve the dispute in a friendly, cordial and amicable way,” said Mr Membe who
added: “But we have agreed that all the exploration activities in the disputed
area be suspended until the matter is settled.”
The way forward
now for the two countries is an arbitration by a third party and the options
according to the resolutions are a council of wise men to be coordinated by the
African Union (AU) or some eminent person(s) approved by both parties.
Should the
arbitration option fail, the dispute would have to be taken to the
International Court of Justice (ICJ) for legal determination.
“We have tasked
the two joint committees of experts and officials to thoroughly deliberate on
the options, outline pros and cons of each and make recommendations before the
next meeting,” said Mr Membe.
He added that
attorneys general of the two countries have also been directed to provide legal
interpretation of the “conflicting” articles of the Heligoland Treaty before
the next meeting scheduled for September 10 until 15 in Dar es Salaam.
The Anglo-German Treaty or Heligoland-Zanzibar Treaty signed on July 1, 1890 between Germany and Great Britain colonial rulers of then Tanganyika and Malawi
respectively is the source of the whole disagreement.
Unlike the 1918
German-East Africa (Deutsch-Ostafrica) map that Tanzania recognises which, like
lakes Victoria and Tanganyika, shares out Lake Nyasa between the countries it
separates, the Heligoland Accord gives Malawi the entire water body.
While Malawi
holds onto Article One, Sub Article Two of the document that defines the
borderline in its favour, Tanzania maintains that Article Six of the same
treaty, which provides for correction in conformity with local requirements,
must not be overlooked.
Article Six
reads: “Any correction of the demarcation lines described in Articles I to IV
that becomes necessary due to local requirements may be undertaken by agreement
between the two powers.”
Mr Membe is on
record as saying that Tanzania has a map drawn by Britain, the then ruler of
Tanganyika (after the defeat of Germany in World War Two) and Nyasaland (even
before) indicating that there was an agreement to review the border and locate
it at the middle of the lake as the case in the border between Malawi and
Mozambique on the same lake.
In a bid to
seek a peaceful solution on the matter, the late Malawi President Bingu wa
Mutharika wrote to his counterpart Benjamin Mkapa, then President of the United
Republic of Tanzania, requesting the formation of a joint committee that would
work on the dispute.
The two
countries then created a joint committee of ministers for foreign affairs that
met for the first time in 2010. But for Malawi, the strategy seems to involve
diplomacy and to the most part, the legal path.
“For us this is
a legal matter; it has been going on for so long, bringing unnecessary tension
to our people,” said Mr Chiume, who adds: “Let’s hope we shall be able to
resolve it amicably.
Mr Chiume said
it was unfortunate that the two sisterly nations had come to the point of
uttering inflammatory statements including the mention of war on a matter that
could be peacefully and permanently resolved.
Following the
reports of whole ownership claim and mineral exploration activities carried out
by multination companies licensed by Malawi in the disputed area, temperatures
went high in Tanzania early this month with various leaders declaring that the
country was ever ready to protector its borders against any aggression.
Reacting to the
fresh revelations, Mbozi East MP, Mr Godfrey Zambi (CCM) demanded a government
statement. The then acting Leader of Government Business in Parliament, Mr
Samuel Sitta, gave the assurance that there would be safety and full security
for residents of Mbeya Region and other areas along Lake Nyasa.
Asking for the
Speaker’s guidance, Mr Zambi said the statement issued by a senior Malawi
government official that the entire Lake Nyasa belonged to his country, needed
a firm stand from the Tanzanian government.
Source:
The Citizen (TZ)
No comments:
Post a Comment